Comments on: 𝌙 – Introducing Camino 2.1a1pre nightlies with Gecko 1.9.2 http://www.ardisson.org/afkar/2010/05/28/introducing-camino-2-1a1pre-nightlies-with-gecko-1-9-2/ A journal at al-Qâhira fî Amrîkâ Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:41:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: افكار و احلام » Camino 2010 in Review http://www.ardisson.org/afkar/2010/05/28/introducing-camino-2-1a1pre-nightlies-with-gecko-1-9-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7439 افكار و احلام » Camino 2010 in Review Mon, 10 Jan 2011 01:53:35 +0000 http://www.ardisson.org/afkar/?p=595#comment-7439 [...] The very next week in February, Christopher got Camino building and running more-or-less as expected on Gecko 1.9.2, and I started producing the first of many experimental builds while we fixed lingering issues and worked on building “out-of-the-box” with that version of Gecko, a process that lasted until late May. [...] [...] The very next week in February, Christopher got Camino building and running more-or-less as expected on Gecko 1.9.2, and I started producing the first of many experimental builds while we fixed lingering issues and worked on building “out-of-the-box” with that version of Gecko, a process that lasted until late May. [...]

]]> By: Smokey http://www.ardisson.org/afkar/2010/05/28/introducing-camino-2-1a1pre-nightlies-with-gecko-1-9-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7253 Smokey Tue, 08 Jun 2010 05:13:47 +0000 http://www.ardisson.org/afkar/?p=595#comment-7253 Zellyn! Random, indeed! Things are good; how is that “famous singing timepiece” these days? More later via typical channels… :-) Zellyn! Random, indeed!

Things are good; how is that “famous singing timepiece” these days? More later via typical channels… :-)

]]> By: Zellyn http://www.ardisson.org/afkar/2010/05/28/introducing-camino-2-1a1pre-nightlies-with-gecko-1-9-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7252 Zellyn Tue, 08 Jun 2010 04:00:51 +0000 http://www.ardisson.org/afkar/?p=595#comment-7252 Hi! Just ran across a random comment by you on this post: http://curtisb.posterous.com/what-should-mozilla-look-for-in-an-automated How are things going? Zellyn Hi! Just ran across a random comment by you on this post: http://curtisb.posterous.com/what-should-mozilla-look-for-in-an-automated

How are things going?

Zellyn

]]> By: Smokey http://www.ardisson.org/afkar/2010/05/28/introducing-camino-2-1a1pre-nightlies-with-gecko-1-9-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7245 Smokey Sat, 29 May 2010 02:42:20 +0000 http://www.ardisson.org/afkar/?p=595#comment-7245 The nightlies are, in theory, capable of performing automatic updates, but they currently do not (and for the foreseeable future will not). <a href="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414065" rel="nofollow">Bug 414065</a> has a little bit of the discussion of why we don’t have nightly updates—though there are also other considerations, such as the way Sparkle works (checking for updates based on usage time rather than absolute elapsed time) and issues surrounding putting our key on the tinderbox(en). I had a decent automation routine set up for enabling updates for the experimental builds, and it was still a pain, even doing so only fortnightly. :( The nightlies are, in theory, capable of performing automatic updates, but they currently do not (and for the foreseeable future will not). Bug 414065 has a little bit of the discussion of why we don’t have nightly updates—though there are also other considerations, such as the way Sparkle works (checking for updates based on usage time rather than absolute elapsed time) and issues surrounding putting our key on the tinderbox(en).

I had a decent automation routine set up for enabling updates for the experimental builds, and it was still a pain, even doing so only fortnightly. :(

]]> By: Christopher http://www.ardisson.org/afkar/2010/05/28/introducing-camino-2-1a1pre-nightlies-with-gecko-1-9-2/comment-page-1/#comment-7244 Christopher Sat, 29 May 2010 00:29:37 +0000 http://www.ardisson.org/afkar/?p=595#comment-7244 Can the Camino nightlies auto-update themselves like the official releases do? Can the Camino nightlies auto-update themselves like the official releases do?

]]>