<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crash Reporting Redux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ardisson.org/afkar/2009/11/09/crash-reporting-redux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ardisson.org/afkar/2009/11/09/crash-reporting-redux/</link>
	<description>A journal at al-Qâhira fî Amrîkâ</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:41:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smokey</title>
		<link>http://www.ardisson.org/afkar/2009/11/09/crash-reporting-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-7040</link>
		<dc:creator>Smokey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ardisson.org/afkar/?p=504#comment-7040</guid>
		<description>Thanks, ozten. I wasn’t aware the presence of comments could affect processing policy, too; that’s good to know.  If only we’d get more users submitting comments. ;-) 

In the case of this sample crash, I did still get the the processing screen for a couple of refreshes despite the comment, but I also forgot to check the server load at the time to see if it seemed heavy.  I think usually when I submit a report with a comment, I’m able to see the processed incident by the time I relaunch, so my money is on a heavy server load when I submitted the sample crash for this post.

Keep up the good work on the webtool side of things! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, ozten. I wasn’t aware the presence of comments could affect processing policy, too; that’s good to know.  If only we’d get more users submitting comments. <img src='http://www.ardisson.org/afkar/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>In the case of this sample crash, I did still get the the processing screen for a couple of refreshes despite the comment, but I also forgot to check the server load at the time to see if it seemed heavy.  I think usually when I submit a report with a comment, I’m able to see the processed incident by the time I relaunch, so my money is on a heavy server load when I submitted the sample crash for this post.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work on the webtool side of things! <img src='http://www.ardisson.org/afkar/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ozten</title>
		<link>http://www.ardisson.org/afkar/2009/11/09/crash-reporting-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-7039</link>
		<dc:creator>ozten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ardisson.org/afkar/?p=504#comment-7039</guid>
		<description>Great post! In many parts of the crash report processing system it checks for comments and treat those crashes differently (processing policy, priority in UI display, etc).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post! In many parts of the crash report processing system it checks for comments and treat those crashes differently (processing policy, priority in UI display, etc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

